Autopsy results released in animal attack death of elderly Beaufort County woman

BEAUFORT COUNTY, NC (WITN) - WITN has obtained a copy of the autopsy results of Brenda Hamilton, a veteran school teacher who was killed by an unknown canine.

It was just last week that Beaufort County deputies completed their investigation into the Pantego woman's death and said they were unable to determine what kind of canine attacked her.

WITN has chosen not to describe Hamilton's injuries in graphic detail, but the 77-year-old woman sadly suffered numerous extensive injuries all over her body.

Hamilton was attacked back on February 15th while she was walking on Indian Run Road outside of Pantego.

Deputies say Hamilton was found in a ditch submerged up to her shoulders in water. Neighbors awakened by their barking dogs found them near Hamilton and alerted authorities.

Hamilton was taken to the hospital unresponsive and died three days later on February 18.

The autopsy report states that Hamilton's husband said she walked every morning around 5am with a group of local dogs.



PREVIOUS STORY

Deputies say they have completed an investigation into the death of a veteran school teacher and say they do not know what type of canine attacked her.

Brenda Hamilton was killed back on February 15th while she was walking on Indian Run Road outside of Pantego.

The woman was in her 51st year of teaching at Pungo Christian Academy.

Deputies say Hamilton was found in a ditch submerged up to her shoulders in water. Neighbors awakened by their barking dogs found them near Hamilton and alerted authorities.

The 77-year-old woman died several days later.

Investigators say the two dogs were not wet and there was no visible signs of mud or blood on them. Field tests done later that afternoon showed trace amounts of human blood on their paws and in their mouth.

The dogs were eventually seized and quarantined for observation. Deputies say they never showed any aggression during the ten-day quarantine and were then returned to their owners.

DNA samples were taken from 14 dogs in the area of the attack, as dog DNA was found on the victim's outer jacket and her shoe. It matched the two dogs that were found near the woman on the day of her attack, deputies say.

The lab located dog mitochondrial DNA on a swab from Hamilton's ear, a swab from her scalp, the flashlight she carried in her hand, her hooded sweatshirt, her t-shirt and a dead nutria which was found nearby.

Deputies say that DNA likely came from one of the same two dogs, however mitochondrial DNA, which comes from the mother, is non-discriminating and a match to a specific dog could not be made.

After a hearing, Beaufort County's Dangerous Dog Committee did not find the dogs dangerous.

"After the completion of all testing and a review of the scientific and circumstantial evidence in this case, we are unable to make a definitive determination as to what type of canine attacked Brenda Hamilton," deputies said in a news release. "While the DNA evidence brings the 2 domestic canines under suspicion, the observations of those 2 canines by Deputies, Animal Control Officers and Investigators tells a different story."


Beaufort County Sheriff's Office News Release

On the morning of Mrs. Hamilton’s attack, the Chavez family, was awakened by their dogs barking by the road where the attack occurred. When they went to investigate they found their dogs near Hamilton who was lying in a ditch submerged up to her shoulders in water. Mr. Chavez pulled Hamilton from the water while his wife summoned help from another neighbor, Susan Davis. Davis then called 911.

EMS Personnel arrived to find Hamilton suffering from catastrophic injuries to both arms, both legs, and her scalp. She was transported to Vidant Pitt where she died days later.

Beaufort County Sheriff’s Deputies and Animal Control Officers responded to the scene. NC Wildlife Officers and Biologist also responded to aid in the investigation. Investigators were not able to locate any eye witnesses to the attack which likely occurred during darkness, shortly after 5:00 am that morning,

Deputies located a dead nutria near where the attack began. The nutria appeared to be a fresh kill and injuries to it appeared to have been inflicted by another animal. A considerable amount of blood was also found on the road leading Investigators to where Hamilton was found in the ditch. The two dogs found near Hamilton were examined about an hour after the attack by Deputies and Animal Control Officers. The dogs displayed no signs of aggression towards Deputies, they were not wet, and there was no visible sign of mud or blood on either dog. Later, on the afternoon of the attack, field tests for blood were performed and both dogs tested positive for trace amounts of human blood on their paws and in their mouth.

On the same day of the attack, Wildlife took several items of evidence to the forensics lab at Western Carolina University to be tested. The next day Sheriff’s Investigators were told by NC Wildlife Biologist that domestic canine DNA was located on Hamilton’s outer jacket and one of her shoes and based on those test results NC Wildlife would no longer be involved in the investigation. However, on the following Monday Sheriff’s Investigators spoke directly with the lab and learned the DNA found during initial testing was likely domestic canine DNA but the testing did not rule out wild canines indigenous to the area. For that reason, the Beaufort County Sheriff’s Office requested the lab perform further testing in a search for definitive answers.

On Sunday, February 17, 2019, 2 days after the attack the 2 dogs found near Hamilton were seized at the request of the Sheriff’s Office by Beaufort County Animal Control and quarantined for observation. Again, the dogs displayed no aggression when they were seized and at no time during their quarantine. The dogs were returned to their owners after 10 days of observation.

The day of the attack and the following week, Investigators collected 14 DNA samples from domestic canines in area. Those samples and other items of evidence were submitted to the lab for further testing. A total of 33 items were eventually submitted for testing.

During the investigation, Investigators learned that Mrs. Hamilton walked the same route frequently as part of her daily exercise regimen. During her walk it was common for her to be accompanied by domestic dogs in the area, including the 2 dogs found near her the morning of the attack. Hamilton’s husband reported none of the dogs ever bothered her or displayed any aggression towards her on her daily walks.

Some of the first test results returned to Investigators found domestic canine DNA on both Hamilton’s outer jacket and her shoe. That DNA was a match to the 2 dogs previously seized. After the completion of 49 separate tests Investigators also learned the lab located domestic canine mitochondrial DNA on 6 other items of evidence, a swab from Hamilton’s ear, a swab from her scalp, the flashlight she carried in her hand, her hooded sweat shirt, her t-shirt and the dead nutria. The mitochondrial DNA likely came from one of the same 2 dogs, however mitochondrial DNA, which comes from the mother is non-discriminating and a match to a specific dog could not be made. All other items tested yielded no DNA results. While the reason for that is unknown, it is believed those tests were affected because Hamilton was in water up to her shoulders. All testing in this case is now concluded. No items recovered from the scene yielded DNA results indicative of coyote or bear.

The evidence in this case was reviewed by Beaufort County’s Dangerous Dog Committee. An Investigator with the Sheriff’s Office, the dog’s owners and neighbors familiar with the dogs all testified before the committee and after a review of the evidence and testimony, the Committee did not find the dogs to be dangerous.

After the completion of all testing and a review of the scientific and circumstantial evidence in this case, we are unable to make a definitive determination as to what type of canine attacked Brenda Hamilton. While the DNA evidence brings the 2 domestic canines under suspicion, the observations of those 2 canines by Deputies, Animal Control Officers and Investigators tells a different story.