UPDATE: Pitt Co. D.A. Responds To Debate Clarification From Sheriff

Pitt County Sheriff Mac Manning is responding to the Pitt County District Attorney who took issue with some of what was said by the sheriff during Thursday's debate.

Manning says the comments he made did not refer to District Attorney Clark Everett, but instead to challenger Neil Elks.

WITN talked with Everett Saturday who provided this email response:

"During the debate between Mac Manning and Neil Elks, I was
concerned about statements made by Sheriff Manning regarding two
aspects of the Michelle Pollard obstruction of justice investigation.

The first was a statement that I had pulled the trigger prematurely by initiating an SBI inquiry into Michelle Pollard's conduct in June 2009 before the Pitt County Sheriff's Office was given time to complete their internal investigation. I believe my decision was timely and correctly made. At the time of my request, the Sheriff's internal investigation was apparently complete and no criminal charges were being sought. I had no conversations with the Sheriff during this investigation. The SBI conducted the investigation in an extremely competent and professional manner resulting in the indictment and later conviction of Michelle Pollard for felonious obstruction of justice.

The second was a statement implying that I had talked with the
Sheriff during the investigation revealing the identity of persons who
had provided information in this case. In fact, I had no conversation
with Sheriff Manning concerning this information until after the trial
of Michelle Pollard and after the information had been revealed
through the criminal discovery process.

Yesterday, I was contacted by Sheriff Manning and he explained
that his statement that "they pulled the trigger" was not referring to
the District Attorney's Office or the SBI and that he was satisfied
with our decisions. He also agreed that any conversations regarding
this case did not occur during the investigation but rather at a time
after Pollard's trial. Although the intent and target of these
statements made by the Sheriff will be debated, I am satisfied that in
regards to the District Attorney's Office and the SBI, the record is
now clear that the decisions made were timely and proper." Clark Everett, Pitt County D.A.

Below is the press release Manning released Saturday:

"During the sheriffs’ debate on Thursday I made a statement in rebuttal to Neil Elk’s admission that he had some involvement in the reporting of the Michelle Pollard obstruction case to the District Attorney. My first sentence spoken in the rebuttal was “Basically, they pulled the trigger prematurely.” The word “they” was referring to Elks’, his camp or whomever he was referring to that he stated made these reports to the District Attorney. I was not referring to the District Attorney or anyone in his office. Neither Elks nor anyone associated with his campaign could or would have been privy to the facts uncovered by the internal investigation at the Sheriff’s Office.

I further alluded to and stated that Elks’ involvement and admission smacked of political motivation. That has certainly played out throughout this campaign as Elks has made the Pollard case the centerpiece of his political rhetoric and seemingly his only campaign platform. Elks had long retired from the Sheriff’s Office, and was actively campaigning to unseat me at the time this incident occurred.

I want to clearly correct any perception by anyone who watched or listened to the debate and who, like the WITN reporter, interpreted my comments to be in reference to the District Attorney. Those comments by me were not intended to be in reference to the District Attorney or to be critical of any of his actions concerning the case. I have the upmost respect for District Attorney Clark Everett and believe him to be a fair and conscientious prosecutor.

Nevertheless, if anything I said reflected poorly on the District Attorney, then I sincerely apologize to him and the personnel in his office. Any negative perception toward the District Attorney regarding my comments would be undeserved and certainly not intended by me."

WITN would like to make it clear: the follow-up coverage done about the district attorney's concerns was done because of concerns we were told the district attorney had.

PREVIOUS STORY:

Pitt County District Attorney Clark Everett says he wants to set the record straight when it comes to the obstruction of justice investigation into former lieutenant Michelle Pollard. Pollard is now in prison for tipping off the target of a drug investigation.

During Thursday's televised debate between Sheriff Mac Manning and challenger Neil Elks, Manning said, "Basically, they pulled the trigger prematurely. We were conducting an internal investigation and we took appropriate action with the employee. We had not even completed our reports and our internal investigation."

Everett tells WITN News he disputes Manning's account of the action by the D.A.'S office.

Everett says, "The impression is we did something too soon, that we came barreling in. When we (D.A. & S.B.I.) got into it the sheriff's office internal investigation was over and they didn't find any criminal conduct and decided not to do anything and didn't notify us."

Everett goes on to say, "Several people contacted the D.A.'s office from several sources and we were able to substantiate their claims and start an investigation. Mac didn't know what was going on."

Manning also stated during the debate, "The evidence that was produced through our internal investigation is some of the same evidence that was eventually used in the prosecution. So I feel very confident in the action we took."

Everett says, "The internal report was not part of our investigation. It would be illegal to use an internal investigation."

Everett says he is speaking out to clear up the action taken by his office.


You must be logged in to post comments.

Username:
Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by ABCs Location: Pitt Co on Apr 28, 2010 at 10:36 PM
    THANKS FOR STATING THE OBVIOUS! Posted by: Local LE Location: Greenville on Apr 24, 2010 at 08:20 AM Internal Investigations are just that, Internal. They can not be used in criminal proceedings. That being said, Everett prosecutes criminal cases. That means that he would not be given a copy of the IA. So how can he say that the IA didnt find any wrong doing?
  • by Common Sense 53 Location: Pitt County on Apr 28, 2010 at 10:18 PM
    Homegirl, just out of curiosity, who did Paula Dance ask "several times" to call the SBI regarding the Pollard case?
  • by Rosie on Apr 28, 2010 at 04:18 PM
    What's a POLITION? I've heard of a politician, but not a polition.....
  • by Mac's Got Your Back! Location: Winterville, NC on Apr 28, 2010 at 01:01 PM
    Mac is the man for the job. Keep it up Mac. You are going to win. The main gig the other side has is they like to throw stones. Thanks for being our sheriff! I got your back Mac!
  • by For Neil on Apr 28, 2010 at 05:33 AM
    Public speaking is a trait for a POLITION Neil is not a polition he is a good man.Thats what we NEED for the Sheriff in Pitt County. A good man. Neil has a better "solved rate" with crime investigation than Mac ever had. I used to work with both of them. Neil is an excellent investigator and will be a excellent Sheriff!!
  • by For Mac Location: Pitt County on Apr 27, 2010 at 10:55 AM
    Mac Manning is the man for the job. He has the expert skills and resources for Pitt County to get the most help for the citzens in grants,budget,etc. I don't think Neil is a good speaker and he doesn't seem confident in what he is speaking about and when you talk to people you have to have that stride about yourself to show you are a leader and I didn't see that in the debate with Mr. Elks. Vote for Mac!!!
  • by To homegirl on Apr 27, 2010 at 10:06 AM
    You were correct except for one thing needed to be clarified. Don't talk to deputies. The will answer " I support my boss" whether they do or not that is their answer. When you work in a position were you can be let go just becuase the law allows the Sheriff to have that authority, then deputies can not be honest about their feelings. So ask other cops, just leave the deputies alone. This is more stressful for them, Neil has retirement and so does Mac so they are set. The deputies just try to survive election times. So please don't ask them about this election. They want May 4th to come and go quicker then anyone can imagine. How long do you think a deputy would be a deputy if he/she placed a Elks sign in the yard? So just leave them alone when they are eating in a restaurant or buying something in a store or trying to do their jobs. They don't want to talk about it, they just want to get through it.
  • by To Bobby on Apr 27, 2010 at 09:57 AM
    I agee with you about the DWI's. The way you start affecting that is these are elected officials too. Along with the DA. If you feel they are not doing a good job and I see you don't. I tend to agree then make sure you are out there when these judges want to be re-elect. I feel yours and cops frustrations!
  • by For Mac Location: Pitt County on Apr 26, 2010 at 06:54 AM
    Mac is the better man for the job. Question for Mr. Elks if you are not the winnner will you still talk about the pollard case? I doubt it. You and your camp have really talked this case to death. If this is so much on your mind then maybe you are the one with a guilty heart for not doing anything.
  • by Homegirl Location: Pitt Co. on Apr 25, 2010 at 10:31 PM
    I did not finish my comment. Mrs. Pollard would probably say how hard it is to grieve and at the same time have to beg law enforcement to investigate the death of your son. Det. dance requested the SBI several times that night and was denied. It was also the beginning of her downfall. As for the debate, Mac has been doing public speaking for years. Neil Elks has been doing investigations and he is very good at it. Come on Pitt Co. you are smarter than to fall for a bunch of 50 cents words. Read between the lines and talk to other law enforcement officers before bashing Neil Elks. He is the right man for the job.
WITN

275 E. Arlington Blvd. Greenville, NC 27858 252-439-7777
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 91969949 - witn.com/a?a=91969949
Gray Television, Inc.