Murky Future For Auto Rescue Amid GOP Opposition

A House-passed bill to speed $14 billion in loans to Detroit's automakers stands on shaky ground in a bailout-weary Congress, undermined by Republican opposition that could derail the emergency aid in the Senate.

Republicans are challenging lame-duck President George W. Bush on the proposal, arguing that any support for the domestic auto industry should carry significant concessions from autoworkers and creditors and reject tougher environmental rules imposed by House Democrats.

The House approved the plan late Wednesday on a vote of 237-170. It would infuse money within days into cash-starved General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC. Ford Motor Co., which has said it has enough cash to make it through 2009, would also be eligible for federal aid.

Supporters cited dire warnings from GM and Chrysler executives, who have said they could run out of cash within weeks, and concerns that a carmaker collapse would erase tens of thousands of jobs and jolt an already bleak economy.

Democrats and the Bush White House hoped the Senate would vote on the legislation as early as Thursday. But based on concerns raised by GOP senators — and a still-uncertain level of support even among Democrats — they had a lot of work to do.

The measure's murky outlook reflected the difficulty of approving another federal financial rescue on the heels of the deeply unpopular, $700 billion Wall Street bailout, as the clock ticks down on the current Congress and Bush's influence is at a low ebb.

"People realize that this bill is an incredibly weak bill (and) is the product of an administration that wants to kick the can down the road and let somebody else deal with it," said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.

Even Republicans representing states with automobile plants said the proposal was far from ideal. Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., whose state is home to five auto plants, said he wanted to see changes. Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, said the bill lacked the necessary Republicans to pass the Senate.

The measure would create a government "car czar," to be named by Bush to issue the loans, empowered with the ability to yank back the loans and force the carmakers into bankruptcy next spring if they fail to cut quick deals with labor unions, creditors and others to restructure their businesses and become viable.

Opposition wasn't limited to Republicans.

Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana is opposing the measure because of a provision to bail out transit agencies that were involved in transactions now considered unlawful tax shelters.

Under the House-passed bill, the carmakers would have to submit blueprints on March 31 to the industry overseer showing how they would restructure to ensure their survival, although they could be given until the end of May to negotiate with the government on a final agreement.

The automakers initially asked Congress for $25 billion, then returned two weeks later to plead for as much as $34 billion. But with the White House refusing to dole out new spending for the Big Three, congressional Democrats agreed to use an existing program that was to help carmakers retool their factories to make more fuel-efficient cars.

That fund yielded only $15 billion in emergency loans, and when negotiators agreed to leave some money in the environmental program, the amount fell to $14 billion.

Democrats agreed to scrap language — which the White House had declared a deal-breaker — that would have forced the carmakers to drop lawsuits challenging tough emissions limits in California and other states. But they kept a provision to force the automakers to abide by those states' limits — a kind of consolation prize for environmentalists, who already were livid at the raid of the fuel-efficiency program.

Senate Democrats unveiled a nearly identical measure that omitted the requirement, but that bill still faced long odds.

The Bush administration is expected to work with President-elect Barack Obama's team on choosing the industry czar. The overseer would have say-so over any major business decisions by the automakers while they were taking advantage of federal aid, with veto power over any transaction of $100 million or more.

The measure also would attach an array of conditions to the bailout money, including some of the same restrictions imposed on banks as part of the $700 billion Wall Street rescue. Among them are limits on executive compensation, a prohibition on paying dividends and requirements that the government share in future profits and taxpayers be repaid before any other shareholders.

Also included in the bill is an unrelated pay raise for federal judges.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Dwayne Location: Greenville on Dec 11, 2008 at 11:31 AM
    Is someone ready to upstart a new American auto company that isn't corrupt at the administrative level and run by the Union?
  • by Kimo Location: Belhaven on Dec 11, 2008 at 07:21 AM
    Are they really talking about bailing out the Big 3 - or are they really talking about ensuring the viability of the UAW and all their campaign contributions?? The latter would be my guess. And what about including a "mass transit" bailout in this legislation. Give me a break!! Apparently there is no end to the deviousness of our so called "representatives"?? They are "representatives" all right, but not of us. More like the Governoer of IL - they represent the highest bidder!!! Let the Big 3 and their unions go down the pipes. The country will be better off for it!!!
  • by Devil Dog Location: New Bern on Dec 11, 2008 at 04:45 AM
    CONGRESS is like a Pop Warner football team playing intellectual gymnastics with the private sector(the NFL). Individuals in CONGRESS,mostly lawyers, do not have the mental ability to understand the ecomic/financial problems let alone solve them. As long as the electorate votes for STYLE over SUBSTANCE nothing will change. PEOPLE better review history and get more involved on issues. Counting on big government, to solve problems, will bring on more heartache.
  • by Jay Location: Winterville on Dec 11, 2008 at 04:24 AM
    No bailout. Put an end to socialism - no bailout!!! The auto industry has been destroyed by the UAW. Unions are a cancer on our economy.
  • by NO MORE Location: Eastern NC on Dec 11, 2008 at 04:13 AM
    OMG another bailout. My pocket can't afford another tax increase. Let the auto manufacturers declare bankruptcy, restructure eliminate the union and fire the top execs with no pay of golden chutes. Let's face it they failed

275 E. Arlington Blvd. Greenville, NC 27858 252-439-7777
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 35952379 -
Gray Television, Inc.