Washington State Lawmakers Pass Gay Marriage Bill

The Washington state Legislature has voted to legalize gay marriage, setting the stage for the state to become the seventh in the nation to allow same-sex couples to wed.

The action comes a day after a federal appeals court declared California's ban on gay marriage unconstitutional.

The Washington state House passed the measure on a 55-43 vote Wednesday. The state Senate approved the proposal last week.

Democratic Gov. Chris Gregoire is expected to sign the bill next week, and it would take effect 90 days later. But opponents have promised a challenge, which could put the law on hold pending the result of a November vote.

Same-sex marriage is legal in New York, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont and Washington D.C.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Anonymous on Feb 15, 2012 at 12:54 PM
    LOL New Jersey is getting ready to join the 21st century and legalize gay marriage as well. How does it feel bigots? Where is you god now?
  • by Hetero on Feb 10, 2012 at 08:03 AM
    Yes, Pat, because only gay people get AIDS. Man you're so smart. Arrogant, dumb people like you can stay in your ferry tale that only gays get AIDS. Go smoke some meth.
  • by Pat on Feb 9, 2012 at 06:30 PM
    Rock Hudson and Liberachi would be so proud. Didn't they die of Aids?
    • reply
      by Anonymous on Feb 10, 2012 at 05:43 AM in reply to Pat
      Yep and so have tens of thousands of straight, hetrosexual people.
  • by Surfer girl on Feb 9, 2012 at 05:18 PM
    Thanks to the Washington Legislature! May you pass your wisdom to end discrimination to the people of NC.
  • by Anonymous on Feb 9, 2012 at 01:06 PM
    Homosexuality has been around a lot longer than your religion.
    • reply
      by HetroMan on Feb 9, 2012 at 05:36 PM in reply to
      If that were the case we would not be here.BTW,where is that book to prove it?
      • reply
        by Anonymous on Feb 10, 2012 at 05:43 AM in reply to HetroMan
        Yeah we would, evolution and all being how we were created.
  • by Obama Snake Oil co Location: Washington on Feb 9, 2012 at 09:50 AM
    Since the Catholics created the sanctity of Marriage as we know it, how about checking with them to see if this is going to be OK?
    • reply
      by Truth on Feb 9, 2012 at 10:49 AM in reply to Obama Snake Oil co
      "Sanctity": The state or quality of being holy, sacred, or saintly. What exactly is holy about a state marriage?
    • reply
      by saywha? on Feb 9, 2012 at 11:00 AM in reply to Obama Snake Oil co
      snake oil the scholar strikes again! I'm sure that you are aware that there were a number of Eastern Rite churches in existence prior to the Roman Catholic Church's coalescence (the Ethiopian and Armenian Orthodox Churches to name a couple) that had views on marriage. That said, if I'm not a Roman Catholic, why should I give two bits about whether or not they are OK with it?
      • reply
        by Obama Snake Oil Co on Feb 9, 2012 at 01:32 PM in reply to saywha?
        So you gettin lazy in your old age? The Roman Catholic tradition of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries defined marriage as a sacrament ordained by God,[37] signifying the mystical marriage of Christ to his Church.[80] "The matrimonial covenant, by which a man and a woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life, is by its nature ordered toward the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring; this covenant between baptized persons has been raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a sacrament."[81] The mutual love between man and wife becomes an image of the eternal love with which God loves humankind. The celebration of marriage between two Catholics normally takes place during the public liturgical celebration of the Holy Mass, because of its sacramental connection with the unity of the Paschal mystery of Christ (Communion). Sacramental marriage confers a perpetual and exclusive bond between the spouses. By its nature, the institution of marriage and conjugal love is ordered to the procreation and upbringing of offspring. Marriage creates rights and duties in the Church between the spouses and towards their children: "[e]ntering marriage with the intention of never having children is a grave wrong and more than likely grounds for an annulment."[82] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage#Roman_Catholicism
        • reply
          by saywha? on Feb 9, 2012 at 01:49 PM in reply to Obama Snake Oil Co
          What exactly in my post are you replying to?
        • reply
          by Obama Snake Oil co on Feb 9, 2012 at 03:14 PM in reply to Obama Snake Oil Co
          By posting you dribble response to my earlier post. If you read the link, that you could have googled yourself, you would know what I posted was factual as it applies to my church.
        • reply
          by Truth on Feb 9, 2012 at 04:14 PM in reply to Obama Snake Oil Co
          So what if it's factual - he asked you why he, as a non-catholic, should care what the catholic church says on the matter; you didn't answer that. He claimed there are older churches that existed prior to the Roman catholic church, namely the Armenian Apostolic Church (est. 305 AD) with the view that marriage was a holy thing - your wikipedia article does nothing to refute his point, only strengthen it. But, what else should I expect?
        • reply
          by Surfer girl on Feb 9, 2012 at 05:19 PM in reply to Obama Snake Oil Co
          And we all know that Wikipedia is a valid and reliable source. Whatever.
        • reply
          by Anonymous on Feb 10, 2012 at 05:45 AM in reply to Obama Snake Oil Co
          To be fair to wikipedia, as long as the article references it's sources it's pretty genuine and I wouldn't doubt it credibility. However, OSOC still failed to answer the question, or ignored it. Either way he's (as usual) wrong.
    • reply
      by Anonymous on Feb 10, 2012 at 05:43 AM in reply to Obama Snake Oil co
      I didn't know the Catholic church was the governing body of the United States.
  • by Anonymous on Feb 9, 2012 at 09:26 AM
    If you choose to practice the homosexual life style you wont see God's gate.
    • reply
      by Anonymous on Feb 9, 2012 at 10:04 AM in reply to
      You won't see Gods gate if you eat shellfish, mix fibers, get divorced, work on sunday, don't donate to God, don't help the poor, are at anytime selfish, greedy, cheat on a spouse, use violence or do any number of things. So why don't we start making a whole lot more things illegal?
      • reply
        by Obama Snake Oil Co on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:19 PM in reply to
        Typical aethist remark, pull for the old and new as required to justify your feelings....just don't try to pull us down with you, we know better.
        • reply
          by Truth on Feb 9, 2012 at 04:19 PM in reply to Obama Snake Oil Co
          How about I make it so simple a caveman can do it? Why do you want american government to enforce or create laws following your thoughts on Leviticus 18:22 (homosexuality) but you don't seem to care about Leviticus 11:10 (eating shellfish) or Leviticus 11:7 (eating pork)?? All of these rules are from the same book of the old testament.
        • reply
          by Anonymous on Feb 10, 2012 at 05:52 AM in reply to Obama Snake Oil Co
          "For everyone who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother. His blood shall be upon him." (Leviticus 20:9) "If a man lies with a woman during her sickness and uncovers her nakedness, he has discovered her flow, and she has uncovered the flow of her blood. Both of them shall be cut off from her people." (Leviticus 20:18) "Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property." (Leviticus 25:44-45) "Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard." (Leviticus 19:27) "...and the swine, though it divides the hoof, having cloven hooves, yet does not chew the cud, is unclean to you." (Leviticus 11:7) "...do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. Do not wear material woven of two kinds of material." (Leviticus 19:19) "But all in the seas or in the rivers that do not have fins and scales, all that move in the water or any living thing which is in the water, they are an abomination to you." (Leviticus 11:10) "They (shellfish) shall be an abomination to you; you shall not eat their flesh, but you shall regard their carcasses as an abomination." (Leviticus 11:11) "And these you shall regard as an abomination among the birds; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, the vulture, the buzzard." (Leviticus 11:13) "Whatever crawls on its belly, whatever goes on all fours, or whatever has many feet among all creeping things that creep on the earth, these you shall not eat, for they are an abomination." There you go OSOC. A list of things Leviticus calls abominations or says are A-okay. I fully expect you to start supporting the complete ban of all these or reinstating the things it advocates for; like slavery for example.
  • by Anonymous Location: greenville on Feb 9, 2012 at 08:57 AM
    Religious institutions can teach whatever the heck they want as long as it doesn't violate the law. There are many that teach against pre marital sex, but lots of that happens. Also, this "attack" on the Catholic Church is nonsense. The same law already exists in more than one half of the states. Lastly, I'm so sorry, but there is NO research showing that children are any more successful in a home with a mother and father or two fathers or two mothers. You, Dave, are defending yourself with nonsense.
  • by T Location: Washington on Feb 9, 2012 at 08:53 AM
    Have you all forgotten Sodo and Gomorrah and the perverse actions that caused them to burned with fire and brimstone? God is NOT pleased.
    • reply
      by Anonymous on Feb 9, 2012 at 10:03 AM in reply to T
      God isn't real and if is and cares this much about gay people than he's worthless.
      • reply
        by Obama Snake Oil Co on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:20 PM in reply to
        Really? Good luck with that private theory of yours. Oh, they say take the icewater salesman job down there. Its one of the only pert you will have....
        • reply
          by Truth on Feb 9, 2012 at 02:15 PM in reply to Obama Snake Oil Co
          Well, you don't worship the Flying Spaghetti Monster or follow his most holy commandments. What makes you think you won't wind up in the underground freezer of doom?
        • reply
          by Anonymous on Feb 10, 2012 at 05:54 AM in reply to Obama Snake Oil Co
          You'll find out first hand if you've ever had sex with a woman on her menstrual cycle, or been disrespectul to your parents, or cut your hair a certain way, or eaten any manner of shellfish, or done any number of things the Bible says are an abomination. So all I can say is, Hell may be real, and if it is I may go there for not believing in an unjust God, but you'll go there for being a horrible "Christian." At least I'm not trying to pretend to be something that I'm not like you do.
  • by Dave Location: Wilson on Feb 9, 2012 at 08:17 AM
    This has nothing to do with homosexual freedom and everything to do with attacks on First Amendment religious Freedom. We have seen just over the past week that religious institution will not be able to teach that homosexuality is a sin because of these "marriage" laws. This is just like the obama administrations attack on the Catholic church. Marriage not only has religious significance as "one man, one woman" but also historical significance and social significance. Children are much more successful in a home with a strong father and mother. No researcher even tries to deny that.
    • reply
      by Truth on Feb 9, 2012 at 08:52 AM in reply to Dave
      I challenge you to provide evidence or research that validates your claim that hetero families produce more successful children than homosexual ones. Here's two studies that say you're wrong: http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/LGBT-Families-Lit-Review.pdf & http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Marriage%20of%20Same-Sex%20Couples%20Position%20Statement%20-%20October%202006%20(1).pdf Your turn.
    • reply
      by true dave on Feb 9, 2012 at 09:00 AM in reply to Dave
      "Children are much more successful in a home iwth a strong father and mother." True, and for that reason I would rather a child have two strong mothers instead of one single strong mother.
      • reply
        by You sir.. on Feb 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM in reply to true dave
        are stupid in your head! Just saying! I was raised by a single mother! And anyone that knows me will tell you I am one of the nicest, caring, respectful people they know! And maybe you need to learn the difference between right and wrong because I am 19 years old and I know homos, gay, lesbin marriage is wrong!
        • reply
          by Truth on Feb 9, 2012 at 10:47 AM in reply to You sir..
          Perhaps you should read things before you reply. 'true dave' never said anything about children of single parents not being nice, caring, or respectful (although you have really blown that out of the water with your sincere appraisal of someone you don't know as "stupid"). He was merely saying that, according to the data, children with two parents are usually more successful in life than those with a single parent. This is not a gauge of how nice a person is, but rather how much they achieve: financially, educationally, healthiness, and being a law-abiding citizen, etc.
        • reply
          by Anonymous on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:07 PM in reply to You sir..
          "nicest, caring, respectful people they know." "I know homos, gay, lesbin marrage is wrong!" Apparently you're not one of the nicest, caring and respectful people that others seem to believe you are. And if you think it's wrong, than your mother failed at raising you. So yeah, wrong all around. Good day and all.
        • reply
          by Surfer girl on Feb 9, 2012 at 05:22 PM in reply to You sir..
          You have no idea my friend. Tell me why it's wrong, and leave the bible out of it.
    • reply
      by Anonymous on Feb 9, 2012 at 10:03 AM in reply to Dave
      Maybe we should do like Minnesota and make discussion of homosexuality illegal so that gay students get bullied until they commit suicide? I'm sure it'd make you happy to have the blood of children on your hands. Here read this link and be educated. Being narrow minded is only going to hurt you in the long run. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1569797,00.html
  • Page:

275 E. Arlington Blvd. Greenville, NC 27858 252-439-7777
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 138995709 - witn.com/a?a=138995709
Gray Television, Inc.