Obama Weighs Options On Anniversary Of Afghan War

On the eighth anniversary of the beginning of the war in Afghanistan, President Barack Obama is gathering his national security team for another strategy session.

Obama is examining how to proceed with a worsening war that has claimed nearly 800 U.S. lives and sapped American patience. Launched after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to defeat the Taliban and rid al-Qaida of a home base, the war has lasted longer than ever envisioned.

House and Senate leaders of both parties emerged Tuesday from a nearly 90-minute conversation with Obama with praise for his candor and interest in listening. But politically speaking, all sides appeared to exit where they entered, with Republicans pushing Obama to follow his military commanders and Democrats saying he should not be rushed.

Obama said the war would not be reduced to a narrowly defined counterterrorism effort, with the withdrawal of many U.S. forces and an emphasis on special operations forces that target terrorists in the dangerous border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Two senior administration officials say such a scenario has been inaccurately characterized and linked to Vice President Joe Biden, and that Obama wanted to make clear he is considering no such plan.

The president did not show his hand on troop increases. His top commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, has bluntly warned that more troops are needed to right the war, perhaps up to 40,000 more. Obama has already added 21,000 troops this year, raising the total to 68,000.

Obama also gave no timetable for a decision, which prompted at least one pointed exchange.

Inside the State Dining Room, where the meeting was held, Obama's Republican opponent in last year's presidential race, Sen. John McCain, told Obama that he should not move at a "leisurely pace," according to people in the room.

That comment later drew a sharp response from Obama, they said. Obama said no one felt more urgency than he did about the war, and there would not be nothing leisurely about it.

Obama may be considering a more modest building of troops — closer to 10,000 than 40,000 — according to Republican and Democratic congressional aides. But White House aides said no such decision has been made.

The president insisted that he will make a decision on troops after settling on the strategy ahead. He told lawmakers he will be deliberate yet show urgency.

"We do recognize that he has a tough decision, and he wants ample time to make a good decision," said House Republican leader John Boehner. "Frankly, I support that, but we need to remember that every day that goes by, the troops that we do have there are in greater danger."

What's clear is that the mission in Afghanistan is not changing. Obama said his focus is to keep al-Qaida terrorists from having a base from which to launch attacks on the U.S or its allies. He heard from 18 lawmakers and said he would keep seeking such input even knowing his final decision would not please them all.

Obama's emphasis on building a strong strategy did not mean he shed much light on what it would be. He did, though, seek to "dispense with the more extreme options on either side of the debate," as one administration official put it. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss details of the closed-door meeting.

The president made clear he would not "double down" in Afghanistan and build up U.S forces into the hundreds of thousands, just as he ruled out withdrawing forces and focusing on a narrow counterterrorism strategy.

"Half-measures is what I worry about," McCain, R-Ariz., told reporters. He said Obama should follow recommendations from those in uniform and dispatch thousands of more troops to the country — similar to what President George W. Bush did during the 2008 troop "surge" in Iraq.

Public support for the war in Afghanistan is dropping. It stands at 40 percent, down from 44 percent in July, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll. A total of 69 percent of self-described Republicans in the poll favor sending more troops, while 57 percent of self-described Democrats oppose it.

The White House said Obama won't base his decisions on the mood on Capitol Hill or eroding public support for the war.

"The president is going to make a decision — popular or unpopular — based on what he thinks is in the best interests of the country," press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters.


You must be logged in to post comments.

Username:
Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Obama Snake Oil Co Location: Washington on Oct 7, 2009 at 06:20 AM
    Arm Chair quarterbacks come a dime a dozen Barlow, if Obama says this is the good war, fight a good war and do what your general on the ground tells you, not what the government tells you. Its like the boss telling you to sell something, then removing your phone, car and email. How are you going to sell more without the tools you need?
  • by Anonymous on Oct 7, 2009 at 05:36 AM
    You mean if Clinton would have taken care of it, we would have never had the 9/11 attacks. Someone always has to say it was all about the oil. Unless you have been to Iraq and seen first hand what Saddam had done to his people, you have no room to talk. His use of mustard gas, which is classified as a WMD, . there was chemicals found in Iraq but not the amount of what was beleived to be there because he kept stalling the inspectors until he had got rid of everything. A troop surge is what is needed in Afganistan. If you go to the doctors office to you take his advice or his receptionists advice? Its the same with Gen McCrystal, he is the senior military advisor there, why does it take some idiots who have no idea of what the situation is there the ones who is deciding if more troops are sent? Obama finally spoke with the General only because it was making headlines that he has only talked to him once in 7 months.
  • by Barlow Location: Winterville on Oct 7, 2009 at 04:44 AM
    If this would have been done right the first time, we wouldn't have this mess now. Of course, there is no oil in Afghanistan and nobody there "tried to kill somebody's daddy" so we moved on and created a fake enemy to declare war on. Just more left over stink!
  • by Anonymous on Oct 7, 2009 at 01:59 AM
    This is a joke, if your top military advisor says he needs more troops to fight the war then send them. What does Obama know about strategy? Him making a decision included him going to Copenhagen for the Olympic bid instead of taking care of his troops who are counting on him.
WITN

275 E. Arlington Blvd. Greenville, NC 27858 252-439-7777
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 63658497 - witn.com/a?a=63658497
Gray Television, Inc.