Gun Law Complaints Trail Obama During Park Tours

Family in tow for a tour of national treasures far from Washington, President Barack Obama is trailed by criticism from gun opponents and parks advocates for allowing firearms into such majestic places as this.

"There is still time for Congress and the president to take steps to keep loaded firearms away from the valleys of Yellowstone, the cliffs of Yosemite, and the Statue of Liberty — but they need to act quickly," said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

A bill that Obama signed in May permits licensed gun owners to bring firearms into national parks and wildlife refuges as long as state law allows it. The new law, which takes effect in February, will replace rules from the Reagan administration that generally require that guns in national parks be locked or stored in a glove compartment or trunk.

"If they wanted to fight that, they could have," said Jonathan Dorn, editorial director of and editor-in-chief of Backpacker magazine. "That one just felt like a very political decision that was maybe more about politics than about maybe paying attention to the preferences of the vast majority of people who are frequent park users."

Still, Dorn called the law "one hiccup" in an otherwise supportive parks agenda so far by the Obama administration.

The Democratic-controlled Congress passed the less restrictive measure with bipartisan support after Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., inserted it into Obama-backed legislation imposing new restrictions on credit card companies. Democratic leaders decided not to challenge Coburn, and Obama signed the gun measure without comment.

Politically, the move thrilled gun-rights advocates such as the National Rifle Association and outdoorsmen. They generally lean conservative, which may help Obama's soft standing with centrists and independents. But it certainly didn't set well with some of Obama's core Democratic constituencies, environmentalists and gun-control backers.

The Obama family — the president, the first lady and daughters Malia and Sasha, and other relatives — had a busy sightseeing weekend planned: visiting Yellowstone National Park on Saturday and touring Grand Canyon National Park on Sunday.

"Oh, that's pretty good. Cool! Look at that. That's a geyser there," a casually dressed Obama said as he and his family watching Old Faithful erupt after they strolled up a path with park rangers.

Earlier, his entourage walked wooden boardwalks and bridges in the steamy Black Sand Basin, where hot springs and small geysers dot the picturesque landscape.

Their stops come during one of three summer weekends when the administration waived entrance fees at 147 national parks and monuments to spur tourism and boost local economies.

Less than a year in office, Obama doesn't have much of a record when it comes to the national park system. Nonetheless, parks advocates say the administration has indicated it wants to spend more on parks and expand the parks system.

At this point, "it's more rhetoric than it is decisions" but "we believe there's a pretty bold and ambitious agenda brewing for national parks in this administration," said Ron Tipton, the National Parks Conservation Association's senior vice president of policy. "We're seeing the interest right out of the box, and we're seeing it exemplified by a president who takes his family to a national park in his first year in office. That's very unusual."

Dorn, likewise, applauded Obama for "making a pretty significant statement this early in his administration at a time when he's got some pretty heavy things on his shoulders."

From the outset of his presidency, Obama signaled his would be an administration sympathetic to the parks. He signed legislation that set aside more than 2 million acres in nine states as protected wilderness. That was one of the largest expansions of wilderness protection in a quarter-century. Supporters said the law would strengthen the national parks system; opponents called it a "land grab."

Since then, the administration has have taken several other steps that have encouraged parks advocates:

—Proposed cutting the number of snowmobiles allowed daily into Yellowstone in the winter to 318 and requiring guided tours. It proposed a similar policy at other national parks. Wyoming has asked a federal judge to force Yellowstone to allow up to 740 snowmobiles a day.

—Halted the filing of new mining claims on nearly 1 million acres of U.S. Forest Service land near the Grand Canyon for two years while the administration studies whether uranium mining there should be permanently prohibited. It also has pledged to overhaul a 137-year-old hardrock mining law that favors the mining industry.

—Devoted $750 million in economic stimulus money to address a maintenance backlog in parks and increased the operations budget request to Congress for parks by $100 million.

—Picked Jon Jarvis, a biologist and 30-year-veteran who oversees the national parks across the West, to head the National Parks Service.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Well on Aug 18, 2009 at 03:47 AM
    Gun OPPONENTS are upset that he is allowing guns in parks. Are you a gun opponent, Mr. T? Even the NRA supports Obama on this one. This is probably one of a few issues that you can agree with the President, yet you so driven to post negative comments that you didn't even read the story. This bill Obama signed is even less restrictive than one signed by Ronald Reagan.
  • by DONALD Location: Eastern NC on Aug 16, 2009 at 09:12 AM
    I find it hard to believe this topic still comes up! True, animal attacks are reason enough to carry protection, but I worry about the two leg animals more! If you are out with your family in the woods hiking miles from a park ranger and are confronted with a "evil person" with a gun... it's going to be a bad day. If you take guns away from trained lawful citizens, then the only ones with guns will be the people who shouldn't have them... criminals.
  • by MrT Location: LaNC on Aug 16, 2009 at 08:49 AM
    Once again Obama wants a double standard. He wants armed Secret Service team with him in the National Parks, yet he thinks that everyone else should be unprotected.How many National Park goers will be inconvenienced today so this clown and his family of losers can spend up the taxpayers money?He should have been required to leave the Secret Service at the gate, and go through by himself with no protection, like he wants everyone else to do. After all, if the parks are so safe, then he should be fine, shouldn't he?Also, he doesn't seem too worried about the budget flying a Boeing 747 around the country at 50,000 plus gallons of jet fuel per fillup.
  • by MrT Location: LaNC on Aug 16, 2009 at 08:27 AM
    Are the secret service guys taking their guns in the Parks? And why is this Socialist Muslim taking all this trips on the tax payers dime? We can only hope this piece of crap falls in the Grand Canyon.I am so disgusted by this moron.
  • by Mike Location: Edenton on Aug 16, 2009 at 03:11 AM
    Let's see some statistics about how many people were killed or injured by attacking cougars and bears in national parks in the last few years as well as the number of people killed or injured in parks where guns have not been banned. Also include the number of rapes and physical assaults in those parks. I don't think the anti-gunners would want that info published since it would defeat their logic.

275 E. Arlington Blvd. Greenville, NC 27858 252-439-7777
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 53341962 -
Gray Television, Inc.