Legal Counsel For Greenville Police Officer Releases Statement

The law firm representing Greenville police officer Lukisha Pittman has released a statement.

Pittman was arrested Sunday evening in Winterville. You can read the entire police report by clicking on the link above.

The statement from Pittman's legal counsel is below.

"After having seen the coverage of Officer Pittman's arrest and the Winterville Police Officer's interview on television, the legal counsel for Officer Pittman, Dr. Fred Whitehurst and David C. Sutton, feel compelled to respond.

The 8 page arrest report fails to state what really happened. Earlier that day, Officer Pittman had taken her 10 year old son and his 10 year old friend to a basketball tournament. Officer Pittman and the other child's mother agreed to meet in Winterville to drop off the other child. The two boys played and wrestled for a while waiting for the other mother to arrive. By the time the Winterville Police arrived, the two 10 year olds were playing peaceably with both mothers watching. The two mothers told the officer that the kids were playing and if you read the officer's report... he even states that there was no criminal activity afoot.

AT THAT POINT, THE US CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES THAT NO CITIZEN MAY BE LEGALLY DETAINED NOR COMPELLED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION TO THE POLICE.

Officer Pittman knew this.

Officer Pittman had valid reasons for not wanting to give any information, but the important point -- and it seems to be getting lost -- is that she didn't need any reason at all. Any citizen, let alone a police officer, has the legal right to refuse to give out information under these circumstances. It should be deeply concerning to everyone that she got arrested in front of her 10 year old son for perfectly legal conduct. In fact, and this is in the report, she tried to get in her car, but the Winterville officer used force to prevent it and then arrested her when she attempted to call her own supervisor.

Assuming that Officer Pittman spoke loudly, two other points come to mind. Number one, it would be understandable, but more importantly, it is not a crime to speak loudly. The magistrate recognized that when he refused the Winterville Officer's request to add disorderly conduct to the resisting officer charge.

This entire incident is about a mother, who happens to be a police officer,who took her 10 year old son and his friend to a basketball game and arranged a drop-off with the other mother in Winterville. The two children played while their mothers talked. A Winterville Officer arrived and determined that nothing illegal had taken place. Then Officer Pittman exercised her constitutional rights and got arrested in front of the two children. Later, when the grandmother came to get Officer Pittman's child, and was obviously upset, the Winterville police felt it necessary to document what she said as well. Officer Pittman violated no laws and it is a sad day when a mother gets arrested in front of her child for her mistaken belief that she would be protected by the United States Constitution. Ms. Pittman's career has been jeopardized and her family's privacy is a thing of the past. We simply ask that the local citizenry keep an open mind and remember that Officer Pittman is entitled to the same presumption of innocence under the Constitution we protects us all."


Previous Story:

A Greenville police officer is facing a misdemeanor charge.

Lukisha Pittman, a five-year veteran of Greenville police, was arrested Sunday night and charged with resisting a public officer after Winterville police say they got a call about a fight in progress at a business.

It happened around 8:40 p.m. in the parking lot of Robert's Welding in Winterville. Police say when they arrived there were two women and at least two children on the scene. According to police, when officers approached the women to ask what was going on, Pittman told them nothing, that the children were just playing.

Police say when they asked for Pittman's name and address for their report, she told them she knew her rights and didn't have to give them her name.

The police report contains narratives from four members of the Winterville police department.

To read the entire police report click on the link at the top of the story.

The report from the first responding officer reads: "Upon arrival, I observed two juvenile males chasing each other around the parking lot. I made contact with two adult females on the scene. I advised them I had been dispatched to the area in reference to a fight in progress and asked what was going on. One of the females, Ms. Pittman, advised the children were playing and there was no fight. After making sure there was no fight, I asked Ms. Pittman and the other female for their names, addresses and phone numbers so I could complete a report due to the nature of the call. At that time, Ms. Pittman became agitated and advised she was not telling me anything because she knew her rights. I immediately contacted Cpl. Holland and asked for him to come to my location. I advised her again I needed her information to complete my report. She stated she was a police officer and knew that I did not need her information. I asked Ms. Pittman to show me some identification but she refused. I advised her that if she was a police officer she should know I needed her information to complete a report. She advised that she was a Greenville Police Officer and they didn't take a report if no crime had been committed. I advised her that regardless of how they do reports in Greenville, in Winterville we have to do a report for every call we respond to. Ms. Pitman continued to raise her voice and state she was not saying anything until she talked to a supervisor. I advised Ms. Pittman she needed to calm down and stop yelling several times. I advised Ms. Pittman to stay where she was and went to speak with the other female. While I was walking to the other female, I observed Ms. Pittman trying to enter her vehicle through her driver's door. I walked back to Ms. Pittman and advised her to stay out of her vehicle. Ms. Pittman opened her driver's door and tried to get in. I placed my hand on the door and shut it, again telling her to stay out of her vehicle. Ms. Pittman yelled that I could not tell her to stay out of her vehicle. Ms. Pittman started to walk away from me towards the rear of the vehicle and yelled for me not to touch her. I advised Ms. Pittman to lower her voice. Ms. Pittman walked to the passenger side of the vehicle and attemped to enter the vehicle. At this time I placed Ms. Pittman in custody for failing to follow instructions."

The corporal who was called to the scene wrote this in his report: "I spoke to the suspect, Ms. Pittman. Ms. Pittman asked what she had done wrong and why she was being arrested. I advised Ms. Pittman she was being held for resist obstruct and delay. Ms. Pittman got loud again and stated that she didn't do anything wrong and she didn't have to give any of her information to the officer because no crime had been committed. I advised Ms. Pittman that Officer Hignite was dispatched to the location for a fight in progress and that he needed her information for the report. She stated that she didn't want to give out her information because she didn't want it on the news and that Ms. Pittman also stated that she didn't want to give out any information until she spoke to the officer's supervisor. I advised Ms. Pittman that I didn't have to be the scene for her to give her information to the officer."

A female officer who was with Pittman in the booking room wrote this in her report: "While I was in the booking room, Pittman contacted her supervisor via cell phone. Pittman stated she wanted to let him know she was under arrest and to make sure she had a job tomorrow. She stated she was not coming in to work tomorrow. Pittman stated she wouldn't give him her information and Officer Hignite hit her and then put her under arrest. Pittman told her supervisor she didn't know what the exact charge was. Pittman stated she would try to call him back when got a chance."

Winterville police originally told WITN Tuesday morning Pittman claimed she was being unnecessarily questioned because of her race.

But Tuesday afternoon, Winterville police told WITN News Pittman did not mention race. The police chief told WITN someone else on the scene made a racial remark.

Another responding officer on the scene wrote this in his report: "On the way to my patrol car I heard a lady, who I now know to be Ms. Pittman's mother, make a remark to Ms. Pittman's son. The remark was 'it's going to be okay but this is a white versus black world.'"

After being arrested, Pittman was released on a $500 unsecured bond. The 33-year-old Pittman is on administrative duty with Greenville.

When contacted Tuesday afternoon Pittman chose not to speak with WITN News.


Previous Story

A Greenville Police officer has been assigned to administrative duties after she was arrested Sunday night in Winterville.

Lukisha Pittman works for the patrol division of the Greenville Police Department. Court records show Pittman is charged with resisting a public officer, a misdemeanor.

Pittman has been employed with the Greenville Police Department for five years.


You must be logged in to post comments.

Username:
Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Chief Deputy Location: Cant say, I'll be a rat.. on Apr 21, 2011 at 11:17 AM
    Code Blue also known as The Blue Code of Silence is an unwritten rule among police officers in the United States not to report on another colleague's errors, misconducts or crimes. What do have all you LEO's have to say about this ?
  • by Big Brother Location: Greenville on Apr 21, 2011 at 10:47 AM
    Some of you are so stupid!!!! My problem is... if a crime was committed... THEN prove it!!! WHO was fighting... if you call it in... THEN STAY AND GIVE YOUR INFO!!! My sister always talk loud... After no crime was committed or proved to have happened, then why was it not handled better by the officers?? How many officer do it take to handle this situation?? Maybe they need better training. I am sorry no one there could handle this situation any better than this. So be very careful what you say cause this to could happen to you.
  • by Stephens Location: Williamston on Apr 21, 2011 at 02:29 AM
    As a police officer of G'ville, she would have known the frustrations officers go through dealing with people without I.D. She has probably asked many for I.D. herself and if they refused to give it to her, it would automatically put up a flag that they were hiding something. I always carry my I.D., cell, and money/bank card - I was taught this from childhood by my parents, in case you are in an accident or get stranded. Police officer or not, give your I.D. and don't give the police officers a hard time because they are doing their job. The situation was severe enough that someone called it in, therefore it should be investigated, which involves getting all the information of anyone/everyone at the scene.
  • by Just Wondering Location: Here on Apr 20, 2011 at 12:56 PM
    If there was No Crime anywhere in this story, WHY did the magistrate issue a warrant for the charge of RDO ?? Go figure !!!
  • by Chuckles Location: nc on Apr 20, 2011 at 10:36 AM
    I'm not seeing the reasoning for giving the officer a hard time just because he was asking for her info. If she wasn't merely showing her bottom, why would she identify herself as an officer?! She, of all people, knows that if she's going to throw that statement out that she needs to show her credentials. The situation would have never continued. He would have notified his command just as she would have done. Most likely the two supervisors would have spoken (possibly laughing about the passer-by'er over-reacting) and everyone could have called it a day! And people, please stop using the race card. That's just getting old. A butt is a butt is a butt...I don't care what color you are if you're showing your backside!
  • by hmmmm Location: greenville on Apr 20, 2011 at 10:22 AM
    you do have a right to investigate.... To see if no crime.... and didnt have no right to be in parkinglot... hmmmmm property is it private hmmmmm people need help....how hard is this My name is ____ and i work for GPD... hmmmmmm really
  • by Seriously on Apr 20, 2011 at 04:36 AM
    I think once she identified herself as a police officer that was the game changer... now she has to prove that statement. If she was not an officer then she could be charged with impersonating... I think the whole thing esculated because of ego's... But now we all know that we do not have to talk to the police when we are asked questions by the police. I guess something good has come out of all of this; we were given a "constitutional lesson".
  • by Anonymous Location: greenville on Apr 19, 2011 at 05:47 PM
    Why couldn't she leave if no crime was taking place?? This is what I don't get. No crime = everyone goes home, situation is over. If there's no crime, there's no reason to give your information. The woman had the right to refuse to give her personal information, and she had the right to leave since even the officer was satisfied that there was no crime taking place. The fact that he forced her to stay against her will IS A CRIME...last I checked, it's called kidnapping.
  • by kinston on Apr 19, 2011 at 01:03 PM
    i go to greenvile frquently, if I'm ever stopped I will not give any info to the officer. and when he asks for it I'll say nope!, if pittman doesnt have to then neither do I, so go suck on your thumb cause I'm leaving and you cant stop me! this will come back and haunt Greenville PD, if it hasnt already. How many people have already done this because of her.?
  • by FellowCitizen on Apr 19, 2011 at 08:37 AM
    I think this whole thing has gone to far and there might be a lawsuit. PC do not ever provide any Greenville PD officer your ID or answer questions and let's see what happens. As your fellow citizen, I think what has happens. You can take it as far as you want for yourself. I still have respect for LEOs, and I want to do what's right according to the law, and another person's choice doesn't cause me to make an ignorant choice...
WITN

275 E. Arlington Blvd. Greenville, NC 27858 252-439-7777
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 119678064 - witn.com/a?a=119678064
Gray Television, Inc.