$100 Or $1,000? Wide Price Range For Birth Control

Birth control that you must take every single day? A more goof-proof option that costs a lot upfront but then works for several years? Or something in between?

A woman's choice may come down to her wallet: The price of birth control varies dramatically.

Just the pill has a huge range, from $9 a month for generics to $90 a month for some of the newest brands, plus a yearly doctor's visit for the prescription.

Want a once-a-month option? The patch or ring could run you $55 monthly.

Even more reliable are so-called long-acting types, those IUDs or implants that can last years but can cost $600 to nearly $1,000 for the doctor to insert.

That's if you don't have insurance that covers at least some of the tab - although many women do. And if those prices are too much, crowded public clinics offer free or reduced-price options. But it might take a while to get an appointment.

Questions about cost and access to birth control have been swirling for weeks now, intensifying after a Georgetown University law school student testified before congressional Democrats in support of a new federal policy to pay for contraception that she said can add up to $1,000 a year, not covered by the Jesuit college's health plan. Talk show host Rush Limbaugh's verbal assault on her comments became the latest skirmish in the birth control wars.

Soon, the new policy will make contraceptives available free of charge as preventive care, just like mammograms, for women with most employer-provided health insurance. Churches are exempt. But for other religious-affiliated organizations, such as colleges or hospitals, their insurance companies would have to pay for the coverage, something that has triggered bitter political debate.

A major study of nearly 10,000 women that's under way in St. Louis provides a tantalizing clue about what might happen when that policy takes effect.

Consider: Nearly half of the nation's 6 million-plus pregnancies each year are unintended. Rates of unplanned pregnancies are far higher among low-income women than their wealthier counterparts. Among the reasons is that condoms can fail. So can birth control pills, if the woman forgets to take them every day or can't afford a refill.

Only about 5 percent of U.S. women use the most effective contraceptives - a matchstick-sized implant named Implanon or intrauterine devices known as IUDs. Once inserted, they prevent pregnancy for three, five or 10 years. But Dr. Jeffrey Peipert of Washington University in St. Louis says many women turn them down because of a higher upfront cost that insurance hasn't always covered - even though years of pills can cost as much.

"How can we cover Viagra and not IUDs?" wonders Peipert, who is leading the new study.

Called the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, the study is providing those options and a range of others for free. Participants also can choose from birth control pills, a monthly patch, a monthly vaginal ring and a once-every-three-months shot. They're told the pros and cons of each but that the long-lasting options have a lower failure rate.

About 75 percent of women in the ongoing study are choosing the IUD or the implant, Peipert says. After the first year, more than 80 percent of the women who chose the long-acting contraceptives are sticking with them ,compared with about half the pill users, he says.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, the average woman who has two children will spend parts of three decades trying to avoid an unintended pregnancy. The Institute of Medicine says that's one reason that women tend to incur higher out-of-pocket costs for preventive care than men.

Yes, there already are some options for more affordable contraception, such as public clinics or Planned Parenthood.

About 55 percent of local health departments offer some family planning services, according to the National Association of County & City Health Officials. Many of those receive federal Title X funding, which means they can offer contraception on a sliding fee scale. The poorest women may get it free, while others may pay full price or somewhere in between.

There are cheaper generic pills. Peipert says there's little difference between them and pricey new brand-name versions like Yaz.

But some women go through a number of brands before finding one that doesn't cause uncomfortable side effects, says Sarah Brown of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Her organization operates a website, http:// www.bedsider.org , that details options along with the price range.

"Not every woman can use generic pills, by any means," Brown says. "Do we say to people, `Just go get generic cardiac medicines. Hope that works out for you?'"

Peipert notes that contraception is cheaper than what insurers or taxpayer-funded Medicaid pay for prenatal care and delivery. He says economic studies have found that every $1 spent on family planning can save nearly $4 in expenditures on unintended pregnancy.

Do women ask about the price?

"Oh, my gosh, absolutely," exclaims obstetrician-gynecologist Dr. Monica Dragoman of New York's Montefiore Medical Center.

Just last week, she saw a woman whose heart condition could make another pregnancy life-threatening but who couldn't afford the IUD that Dragoman wanted to prescribe, and chose a cheaper option.

If a family's struggling financially, "sometimes contraception is one of the first things to fall off," Dragoman says.


You must be logged in to post comments.

Username:
Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Anonymous on Mar 13, 2012 at 11:41 AM
    Pete- When you use the phrase "keep your legs closed" it implies that the onus is on the woman to abstain (since men don't need to "open their legs"). This is why the idea is outdated- it takes two!! Abstinence was never fully accepted by any culture and it certainly isn't today. Besides, more marriages that are based in abstinence end in divorce than marriages in which the partners to not practice premarital abstinence; which means more single parents trying to raise kids. That's no good either.
  • by ace Location: j ville on Mar 12, 2012 at 05:01 AM
    If you look at the number of people on welfare having childern (Raising kids for money) it would be cheaper to give them birth control than support the kids for 18 years, all the free handouts and more childern created by these people having unprotected sex.
  • by Why? on Mar 12, 2012 at 02:48 AM
    I don't care about controlling women. I do resent paying higher taxes or higher insurance rates to pay for other people's birth control. LET THEM PAY FOR THEIR OWN AND GET YOUR HAND OUT OF MY POCKET OBAMA!
  • by Anonymous on Mar 11, 2012 at 07:19 PM
    Does anybody realize that these pills are used by married women as well. Or that these pills are used for purposes other than contraception. If a loved one has suffered an ovarian cyst, or perhaps lost an ovary, or both, because of cysts, or has heavy bleeding you will see that these medicines can prevent many things, unlike Viagra that has but one use. And, before anyone says they would be covered as medicines NO they would not, not under the legislation currently before congress that Ms. Fluke was speaking about. So please save your morality and sanctimony and actually research an issue before posting about abstinence and responsibility.
  • by sure fire disease free birth control Location: Bible belt on Mar 11, 2012 at 07:18 PM
    So that's why my health insurance is so high. Keep your pants on you worldly heathens
  • by Munchy Location: Pitt County on Mar 11, 2012 at 06:35 PM
    Responsibility is a natural entitlement.
  • by Bethe Location: ENC on Mar 11, 2012 at 06:25 PM
    Abstinence is free.
  • by Get a clue on Mar 11, 2012 at 04:29 PM
    It's 2012...abstinence is not a the answer. People are going to have sex, and unintended pregnancies WILL happen. It's a potential solution that hopefully in the long run can reduce unwanted pregnancies and get some teen moms of welfare because they won't be having kids.
  • by Pete Location: Grifton on Mar 11, 2012 at 01:23 PM
    The safest and most effective way is to keep your leg's closed till the I Do's.No disease,no babies no conflict with the Bible.OH! and no out of pocket expense.
WITN

275 E. Arlington Blvd. Greenville, NC 27858 252-439-7777
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 142237705 - witn.com/a?a=142237705
Gray Television, Inc.