Man Sentenced To Jail For Sex With Dogs

A Washington state man has been sentenced to 30 days in jail for having sex with his two dogs.

Troy Whitson entered an Alford plea Monday in Lewis County Superior Court, meaning he admitted no wrongdoing but acknowledged he'd likely be convicted.

The 21-year-old from the town of Cinebar is restricted from owning animals for two years.

His malamutes have been placed with new owners. Prosecutor Michael Golden said Whitson is a member of a group known as Furries who identify with animals and dress the part in makeup, ears and tail.

Golden says Furries gather for social events but having sex with animals is not part of their normal behavior. He says two of Whitson's Furry friends witnessed the animal sex and turned him in.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by glen Location: new mexico on Jul 7, 2009 at 01:22 AM
    nothing wrong with a man having sex with male dog
  • by Derek Location: Greenville on Jun 26, 2009 at 09:37 AM
    This is precisely why I am in favor of gay marriage, it provides the "christian" family for two individuals that love each other. Even those that are not religious find a partner to make a family, a group of people that are there for each other. Telling two people they cannot marry and enjoy the same benefits as a hetero couple, is the exact thing as parents shunning their child because of who they are.
  • by Ank Location: Greenville on Jun 25, 2009 at 03:58 PM
    *sigh* Actually they belong anywhere in the United States they wish to live. But I'm glad you said you don't agree with them being in a circus. Anyway, the parents of your friend sound like they have real problems. I hope if your someday son tells you he is gay that you will not turn your back on him like they did.
  • by Obama Snake Oil Co Location: Washington on Jun 25, 2009 at 05:48 AM
    No Ank, I don't agree they should be in a circus, they belong in San Francisco. This isn't about hate as you imply. I told you the story of a friend of mine that died years ago from Aid, hope you recall. He was a black fraternity brother and football player...well, his own parents wouldn't come to his funeral, only his sister showed up. His body wasn't taken home, he was buried in Raleigh. His parents would never accept him after he told them. So, don't imply I hate homosexuals, I despise the act.
  • by Ank Location: Greenville on Jun 25, 2009 at 12:01 AM
    lol, good one Derek. Hollywood does somewhat resemble a circus.
  • by Ank Location: Greenville on Jun 24, 2009 at 09:00 PM
    OSOC: I am not even trying to argue with you about whether or not gay marriage should be legal or even if homosexuality is okay or not (we've done that enough on other articles). All I'm trying to say is that homosexuals should not be so hated by someone that that person would say homosexuals belong in a circus. That is blatent bigotry, hatred and ignorance. And you still won't say that homosexuals don't belong in a circus just because they are homosexuals. I want your take on that statement OSOC. Do you think homosexuals belong in a circus, or do you think they have a place in this society with the rest of us sinners.
  • by Derek Location: Greenville on Jun 24, 2009 at 05:32 PM
    Well, I sorta disagree with Ank on this as well: some homosexuals are in a circus, its called Hollywood. But in all seriousness, they are humans like the rest of us brutes. I've clearly stated that homosexuals are no more deviant than heterosexuals, so any arguments to solidify marriage as an institution should look at what our governors have been doing lately. Not to forget Senator 'Promise Keeper' John Ensign, where's the sanctity of that?
  • by Obama Snake Oil co Location: Washington on Jun 24, 2009 at 04:51 PM
    Ank, I agreed with part of her comments and sometimes agree with your, not often, but with the persecution of christians in this country in the name of allowing gay behavior, well, if this is OK, than what about my sheep? I mean, whats the difference if she consents? I mean, isn't it just sexual preference? Obviously, you have not problem with it and probably have never seen public display of it to understand what it is about. I have and will never condone it. Just like this story, this destroys the fabric of marriage and hetero behavior by making it just an act. Well, its not acting and this is no movie. As a democrat, I don't buy into the progressive terd polish. Have a nice evening, OSOC
  • by Ank Location: Greenville on Jun 22, 2009 at 07:44 PM
    OSOC: You thanked Mz.Bzness for her comment. You haven't commented an agreement with what she said, but you certainly haven't disagreed with it. Christ would have spoken out against what she said. All I want is for you to aspire to be Christ-like by saying that homosexuals do not belong in a circus just because they are homosexuals. Have a little integrity, think about how your Christ would react to such a hateful and immature comment as Mz.Bzzness posted.
  • by Derek Location: Greenville on Jun 22, 2009 at 03:35 PM
    so a heterosexual HIV/AIDS person pays for their medical bills, like a homosexual HIV/AIDS person does? why should a homosexual pay more than a heterosexual? Not all homosexuals have HIV/AIDS.

275 E. Arlington Blvd. Greenville, NC 27858 252-439-7777
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 46906762 -
Gray Television, Inc.